News
Health Care
[03/10]
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Reports 24% Increase in Net Revenue With Full Year 2009 Financial Results
[03/10]
Psychiatric Solutions shares rise on buyout report
[03/10]
Big Miami-Dade hospital system nears insolvency More...
Personal Injury
[03/10]
Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10]
CDC uses shopper-card data to trace salmonella
[03/10]
Workers stuck on open drawbridge in Fla. rescued More...
Top Headlines
[03/10]
Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10]
DC courthouse busy with same-sex applications
[03/10]
'Jihad Jane' indictment shows terror's evolution More...
Litigation
[03/10]
Feds probe Toyota Prius crash in NYC suburb
[03/10]
NYC wins right to keep famed restaurant name
[03/10]
Animal activists target Calif. sushi restaurant More...
Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.
|
|
Case Summaries
Health Law
[03/10]
Primiano v. Cook In an action against the manufacturer of an artificial elbow, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where the exclusion of plaintiff's expert's evidence was error as plaintiff's expert, with a sufficient basis in education and experience, testified that the artificial joint "failed to perform in the manner reasonably to be expected in light of its nature and intended function," which was enough to assist a trier of fact.
More...
Injury & Tort Law
[03/10]
Cameron v. N.Y. In an action for false arrest and malicious prosecution, judgment for defendant-officers is reversed where: 1) prosecutors' opinions as to probable cause and complaining officers' credibility are irrelevant in virtually all cases involving claims of malicious prosecution; and 2) the introduction of such evidence was not harmless because it provided strong external validation for propositions that otherwise would have come in only from the defendants' mouths.
More...
Drugs & Biotech
[03/10]
Primiano v. Cook In an action against the manufacturer of an artificial elbow, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where the exclusion of plaintiff's expert's evidence was error as plaintiff's expert, with a sufficient basis in education and experience, testified that the artificial joint "failed to perform in the manner reasonably to be expected in light of its nature and intended function," which was enough to assist a trier of fact.
More...
Class Actions
[03/03]
Byers v. Intuit, Inc. In plaintiff's putative class action on behalf of U.S. taxpayers against the IRS and a consortium of companies in the electronic tax preparation and filing industry (FFA) claiming violations of the Independent Offices Appropriations Act (IOAA) in the charging of fees in exchange for providing e-filing services, as well as a violation of section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, dismissal of both claims is affirmed where: 1) the district court was correct in holding that the IOAA does not apply to the FFA members, as it only applies to a government agency and none of the exceptions in Thomas v. Network Solutions, Inc., 176 F.3d 500 (D.C. Cir. 1999) apply; and 2) the district court did not err in dismissing the Sherman Act claim as the FFA members are entitled to conduct-based implied antitrust immunity with respect to the anti-competitive action taken pursuant to the Ceiling Provisions of the 2005 Agreement with the IRS.
More...
|